Sunday, May 27, 2012

Let’s Be Less Productive!

Something we should really think about: by measuring our society only on the one-dimensional scale of productivity and growth, are we missing the most important things?

Tim Jackson writes:
"By easing up on the gas pedal of efficiency and creating jobs in what are traditionally seen as “low productivity” sectors, we have within our grasp the means to maintain or increase employment, even when the economy stagnates. 

"At first, this may sound crazy; we’ve become so conditioned by the language of efficiency. But there are sectors of the economy where chasing productivity growth doesn’t make sense at all. Certain kinds of tasks rely inherently on the allocation of people’s time and attention. The caring professions are a good example: medicine, social work, education. Expanding our economies in these directions has all sorts of advantages.
"In the first place, the time spent by these professions directly improves the quality of our lives. Making them more and more efficient is not, after a certain point, actually desirable. What sense does it make to ask our teachers to teach ever bigger classes? Our doctors to treat more and more patients per hour? The Royal College of Nursing in Britain warned recently that front-line staff members in the National Health Service are now being 'stretched to breaking point', in the wake of staffing cuts, while a study earlier this year in the Journal of Professional Nursing revealed a worrying decline in empathy among student nurses coping with time targets and efficiency pressures. Instead of imposing meaningless productivity targets, we should be aiming to enhance and protect not only the value of the care but also the experience of the caregiver.
"The care and concern of one human being for another is a peculiar 'commodity.' It can’t be stockpiled. It becomes degraded through trade. It isn’t delivered by machines. Its quality rests entirely on the attention paid by one person to another. Even to speak of reducing the time involved is to misunderstand its value.
"Care is not the only profession deserving renewed attention as a source of economic employment. Craft is another. It is the accuracy and detail inherent in crafted goods that endows them with lasting value. It is the time and attention paid by the carpenter, the seamstress and the tailor that makes this detail possible. The same is true of the cultural sector: it is the time spent practicing, rehearsing and performing that gives music, for instance, its enduring appeal. What — aside from meaningless noise — would be gained by asking the New York Philharmonic to play Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony faster and faster each year?"


Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Mystery Creature Identified


The creature, filmed by a surveillance camera below a deep-sea drilling platform, has been identified as, appropriately, deepstaria enigmatica, and yes, it is a species of jellyfish. There's more info on this surprising animal at Deep Sea News.

Monday, May 14, 2012

Geo-Engineering- Is there a technological solution to global warming?

"For years, even to entertain the possibility of human intervention on such a scale- geo-engineering, as the practice is known- has been denounced as hubris. Predicting long-term climatic behavior by using computer models has proved difficult, and the notion of fiddling with the planet’s climate based on the results generated by those models worries even scientists who are fully engaged in the research. 'There will be no easy victories, but at some point we are going to have to take the facts seriously,' David Keith, a professor of engineering and public policy at Harvard and one of geo-engineering’s most thoughtful supporters, told me. 'Nonetheless,' he added, 'it is hyperbolic to say this, but no less true: when you start to reflect light away from the planet, you can easily imagine a chain of events that would extinguish life on earth.'
There is only one reason to consider deploying a scheme with even a tiny chance of causing such a catastrophe: if the risks of not deploying it were clearly higher. No one is yet prepared to make such a calculation, but researchers are moving in that direction."
Read Michael Specter's wide-ranging and thoughtful review of where we stand:
 The Climate Fixers, at The New Yorker online.