Confronting the Climate Cranks- Mark Hertsgaard, The Nation

"In my journalism I have frequently pointed out the nefarious role the climate cranks have played in our national politics, but I confess I have often wondered how much good this did. I revere the profession of journalism and have long believed that it is best kept separate from activism; each of these callings has its own role to play in the endless struggle to make a better world.

But I am not only a journalist. I am also a father. And as a father who during all of my now 5-year-old daughter's life has been watching governments, especially my own, do next to nothing about the climate catastrophe hurtling toward us, I have come to feel obligated to reach beyond the tools of journalism, vital as they are. Like my colleagues Bill McKibben and Mike Tidwell, two journalists and fathers who have also come to embrace climate activism, I now feel compelled to take more direct action. If Chiara and her peers around the world are to have a decent chance of inheriting a livable planet, the status quo cannot stand. We need transformative change, above all in Washington, and we need it quickly..." 
- (read Confronting the Climate Cranks | The Nation)

Mark Hertsgaard is the author of  HOT: Living Through the Next Fifty Years on Earth, published in January 2011.   

www.markhertsgaard.com

Green Energy Opponents Are the Real Job Killers

David Fenton writing for The Nation January 31, 2011:

"Listen to how we discuss clean energy in this country, and you’ll note that the conversation is exactly upside down. To hear the mainstream discourse tell it, clean energy may be a nice idea but it’s prohibitively expensive. Going green, it’s said, will cost jobs and strangle growth at a time when America must do whatever it takes to get our economy and people working again. Environmentalists are going to raise everyone’s energy bills. We’re the “job killers.”
"This framing of the issue runs 180 degrees counter to the actual facts of life in the year 2011. Clean energy transformation is the best—perhaps the only—path to economic and job growth, including rebuilding our industrial base and competitiveness. As British economist Nicholas Stern has said of clean energy, “These investments will play the role of the railways, electricity, the motor car and information technology in earlier periods of economic history.” (read more... Green Energy Opponents Are the Real Job Killers)

Country team Paris recommends...

The Guardian has released a series of State Department cables which show the US Govt bullying European nations into accepting Monsanto's GM 'food' products.

Here is Ambassador to France Craig Stapleton, (who with George W. Bush co-owned the St Louis-based Texas Rangers baseball team in the 1990s):

"Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits.
"The list should be measured rather than vicious and must be sustainable over the long term, since we should not expect an early victory. Moving to retaliation will make clear that the current path has real costs to EU interests and could help strengthen European pro-biotech voices."

This is pretty astonishing when you consider this is not the US Chamber of Commerce spending corporate money to influence trade regulations in other countries in favor of American products. This is the US State Department, funded by you and I, the taxpayers, bullying allied countries into accepting, against the wishes of their citizens, the genetically modified organisms of a giant multinational corporation. Needless to say, this is not what the State Department is meant to be doing.
(read the full article at the Guardian)

2010 Extreme Weather

When I was a kid, it seemed to me that only old people talked about the weather; these exchanges  seemed too chatty, too giddy, something to do with a lifetime of too many cocktails I thought. I, on the other hand was grave, hypnotized by the nuclear sword of Damocles hanging over us, for which we practiced every week in school. The ever-present Apocalypse.
Now that I am approaching that age, I am finding a personal  irony in the way that Nature, with ever-greater frequency, seems to want to remind us that the apocalypse, if there is to be one,  may also come in the form of ... weather. Bad weather, and lots of it.
Consider 2010: already by Thanksgiving the year was headed for the record books for localized periods of extreme cold, extreme heat, extreme snow, and extreme downpours. Russia burned, and 30% of Pakistan was under water.
And just in December:
- Europe was stuck for weeks in travel chaos with heavy snows. Airports management under scrutiny by EU commission. Moscow airport management under scrutiny after an ice storm shut-down.
- US East coast from the Carolinas to Maine shut down on the day after Christmas  by a monster 'snowicane' (a dense blizzard with hurricane winds); 7,000 flights cancelled, and there too, airport and cities management criticized for the snow fail.
- SoCal/LA: worst flooding in decades, when several months' worth of rain fell in one storm.
- Southeast: multiple record cold temperatures in Florida. Southwest: unseasonably warm.
- India: record-breaking cold wave; Kashmir's  Lake Dal freezes over.
- Days of torrential rain in Queensland, Australia,  flooding over an area bigger than France and Germany combined, military called in.

Now, these are all weather events; to be sure. But since these are precisely the sort of weather events predicted to increase in frequency as the atmospheric quotient of CO2 continues to rise, I think we can in the very least have a strong suspicion that we are seeing the beginnings of predicted climate chaos due to the effects of anthropogenic CO2, which before the Industrial Revolution was at 260 ppm, and which  this year reached 390 ppm.

In the next years we can apparently expect to see such extreme weather events with greater frequency, here and there throughout the world. The near term toll will be an overall  fraying of infrastructure, a growing drain on national, local, and individual resources, a slow-down in public services and efficiencies. We can expect urgent discussions, as are going on in Europe now, about how to better prepare for these contingencies. But as long as  we continue boosting atmospheric CO2,  the extremes will continue to be further record-breakers, and we will always be behind the curve.

More on 2010 weather and climate chaos in Ecoversity.org's Case Focus.


December 2010 Blizzard Timelapse from Michael Black on Vimeo.

Postscript, Dec 31: "Tornadoes fueled by unusually warm weather pummeled the South and Midwest on Friday, killing at least six people and injuring dozens more across Arkansas, Missouri and Illinois. Forecasters said storms could hit along a stretch from near Chicago to New Orleans later in the evening as New Year's Eve celebrations begin.". One man who survived: "It sucked me out of my house and carried me across the road and dropped me," Chris Sisemore of Cincinnati told The Associated Press on Friday. "I was Superman for a while. ... You're just free-floating through the air. Trees are knocking you and smacking you down."
 And  a 100-Car Pileup In North Dakota... Happy New Year!

Live Webcast From Cancun

Watch live webcast of the Cancun Climate Conference:
cc210.mx
oneclimate.net

The Politics Heading into the Cancun Climate Summit

An in-depth report on the international politics of climate change in the lead-up to the Cancun Conference.

Cancun Climate Summit: Time for a New Geopolitical Architecture
26 November 2010, by: Nikolas Kozloff, truthout.org

"As we approach crucial climate change negotiations in Cancun, Mexico, the key question on many people's minds is this: what nation or nations will have the courage to stand up to the United States, which still represents the key obstacle to a binding agreement on global warming? If it looked unlikely that the U.S. would reduce carbon emissions before, the recent midterm elections have made such a possibility seem even more remote: many incoming Republican legislators simply deny that global warming exists.

"Without any targets set for emissions cuts in the U.S., it will be difficult for Washington to fulfill its obligations under the Copenhagen accord, an agreement which many feel is already hopelessly watered down. A US refusal to substantially decrease its emissions could in turn bode ill for future negotiations, since China will certainly claim that Washington is more historically responsible for global warming and is not doing its fair share to halt climate change.

"Developing nations need to get their act together and exercise more pressure on the U.S. In recent years, a leftist bloc of Latin American countries, chiefly Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador and Venezuela, have sought to challenge the U.S. when it comes to setting climate change policy. Ringleader Bolivia, which was particularly opposed to the Copenhagen deal, wants to limit any increase in world climate change to less than 1 degree Celsius (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit).

"Yet, major emitters have failed to even meet Copenhagen's far less ambitious target of limiting the rate of increase to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit). President Evo Morales, who some are pushing for the Nobel peace prize, recently organized a counter climate summit in Cochabamba. The Bolivian president declares that $300 billion a year is necessary to cope with global warming and is lobbying hard for the formation of an innovative international climate court.

Read the entire in-depth report on the situation leading up to Cancun here.

Nikolas Kozloff is the author of Revolution! South America and the Rise of the New Left  (Palgrave, 2008) and No Rain in the Amazon: How South America's Climate Change Affects the Entire Planet (Palgrave, 2010).  Visit his website, www.nikolaskozloff.com.


New York Times/Reuters pre-conference coverage:

Modest Climate Change Steps Are Goal of Meeting in Mexico 
"This year is likely to be recorded as one of the warmest since record keeping began in the 19th century. The United Nations panel of climate scientists says rising temperatures will mean more floods, droughts and sandstorms, as well as rising sea levels.
For Cancún participants, the major challenge is to end a deadlock on sharing the burden of emissions cuts between China and the United States. Their relationship already is strained over China’s trade surplus, North Korea and other issues.
The Cancún meeting also comes as the weak world economy, with euro zone bailouts of Greece and Ireland, has sapped attention from climate change..." (read full story at NYT)

Bolivia Report- Climate Debt

Avi Lewis travels to Bolivia to explore the country's climate crusade from the inside. An excellent reportage.

Interview: Ingrid Betancourt

BigThink asks Ingrid Bettancourt what her experience as a captive of the FARC for 6 1/2 years in the Columbian jungle taught her about human psychology...



Ingrid Betancourt is a French-Colombian politician and anti-corruption activist. In February 2002 Betancourt was kidnapped by the guerrilla organization "Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia" (FARC) while she was campaigning for the presidential elections. She was finally rescued by Colombian security forces six and a half years later.

Pierre Rabhi: To grow one's own garden is today a political act

Pierre Rabhi, farmer, writer and thinker of French-Algerian origin, is one of the pioneers of organic agriculture and the inventor of the concept "oasis everywhere." He urges a form of society more respectful of people and the earth and supports the development of agricultural practices accessible to all, particularly the poorest, while preserving the heritage which nourishes us. Since 1981, he has been spreading his know-how in the arid countries of Africa, as well as France and Europe, seeking to restore their own food to the people. He is now recognized as an  international expert for food safety and participated in drafting the UN Convention for the fight against desertification. He is the founder of the "Mouvement pour la Terre et l'Humanisme" (Colibri), and the author of numerous books including "Earth Song, from the Sahara to the Cevennes", and "Consciousness and Environment: Seeds of the Possible" (co-authored with Nicolas Hulot).
Here is a brief article he posted to his blog recently on the importance of localized food production:

To grow one's own garden is today a political act

It's no surprise that there is a growing chasm between ordinary citizens  and those meant to represent them. Who still feels he or she can participate in choices which concern their future? Yes, our leaders came to office through the vote, but too many of their decisions do not correspond to what they were elected to do. Their function seems limited to piloting  the meandering daily flow of the status quo, which opens no perspectives for the future. Worse, it obliterates them, by assuring the continuation of a model of unlimited growth, a model which everyone understands to be incompatible with the truth of our finite resources.

In spite of our incredible technology, we have created the worst performing society of human history, the most wasteful in terms of energy, in social terms the most destructive, and the least resilient ever, depending entirely as it does on a combustible fossil resource which is running out. And we persevere: that which we call "politics' looks more like a therapeutic assault on a moribund economic system. While mistrust  toward politics is spreading, precariousness and malaise are also increasing. We blame by turn bad management by the state or the abuses of industry, but few call into question the foundational principle of our society: this mercantile logic, which confiscates from humanity that which Nature has given us: life, water, the soil, the seeds… Extending this logic, one can imagine a global cartel possessing the planet and making all of us renters upon it.

To reinvent politics we must protect our sources of life from this mercantile logic which  destroys ecosystems and  impoverishes entire populations- even in countries rich in natural resources. Ecology must be  more than a band-aid on the wounds of the environment. It must lead us to rethink our industry, our medicine, our education, our food. It invites to walk away from the organized pillage and restore the economy to it's most noble function, that is to see to it that basic needs in goods and services are available to the greatest number of people. Our consumer choices are political acts. Everything we can do to become autonomous, that is to satisfy our needs without passing through the corporate machine, is a political act. Even our own country, a 'developed' country, can no  longer assure it's own food supply. We have killed our soils with pesticides, our waters are polluted, our bees disappearing, and GMOs are a despicable sham. And when the petroleum runs out, we are assured of famine.

This is why it is so vital to support local farming and  to create networks of CSA farms- (Community Supported Agriculture).

 To grow one's own garden is today a political act.

- Pierre Rabhi July 8, 2010
- translation: S. Miller
   Orginal post

Colibri: Mouvement pour la Terre et l'Humanisme
Colibri Video Presentation (fr.)
Association pour le Maintien d'un Agricuture Paysanne
USA: Community Supported Agriculture

Pogo - Gardyn- Live From the Guggenheim

John Robbins: "The New Good Life - Living Better Than Ever In an Age of Less"

Excerpts from an interview with John Robbins, scion of the Baskin-Robbins family, about his new book, at OpEdNews:

"I believe there is a hidden blessing in the economic crisis, in the necessary return to reality from a make- waste society. Many of us know, at some level, that we have become caught up in something deeply out of balance, that we are going way too fast, that we are speeding past too many of the things and moments that could really matter. Many of us sense that life is too precious and too precarious to live the way we are living...

"I knew how high ice cream is in saturated fat and sugar, and I was coming to see the link with heart disease… It was disturbing to consider that people might suffer more heart attacks as a result of the company's meteoric growth.

"In 1967, my uncle Burt Baskin, my father's partner in the company, died of a heart attack. A big man, he was only fifty-four years old. I was overwhelmed with grief for the loss of my beloved uncle and increasingly troubled by the existential dilemma I was facing.
I asked my father if he thought there might be any connection between the amount of ice cream my uncle ate and his fatal heart attack. "Absolutely not," he snapped. "His ticker just got tired and stopped working."

"It was not hard to understand why my father wouldn't want to consider that there might be a connection. By that time he had manufactured and sold more ice cream than any other human being who had ever lived on this planet. He didn't want to think that ice cream harmed anyone, much less that it had anything to do with the death of his beloved brother-in-law and business partner. But I could not keep from wondering.

"My dad had groomed me since my earliest childhood to one day succeed him at Baskin-Robbins. The company was expanding rapidly, with annual sales in the billions of dollars. But despite the considerable lure of great wealth, I felt called to a different way of life, one whose purpose wasn't focused on making the most money but on making the biggest difference. Every new generation has an instinct to step out on its own, but what was stirred in me felt somehow much deeper than a stereotypical father-son generational split.

"As a teenager, I had read the writings of Henry David Thoreau, who challenged the relentless pursuit of money and social status. "I love to see anything," he wrote, "that implies a simpler mode of life and a greater nearness to the earth." Seeing people too often make themselves what he called "slaves to the acquisition of money and things," he suggested that "a man is rich in proportion to the number of things he can do without."

"Thoreau's books inspired me to think about topics that were never discussed in the household in which I grew up--issues such as the importance of contact with the natural world, self- reliance, personal conscience, and social responsibility. Meanwhile, I was living in a home with an ice cream cone-shaped swimming pool and a soda fountain that offered guests all thirty- one flavors. My father was proud of his Rolls-Royce and the many expensive classic cars he collected. His yacht was named The 32nd Flavor.

"If money was all that was needed to make a person happy, I would have been jubilant. But I wasn't, and my distress kept growing stronger. I had the distinct impression that even though humanity now had the potential to live upon this earth with more ease and comfort than had ever been possible in human history, we were collectively moving farther and farther away from that possibility.

"I thought that Gandhi was right when he said that there is enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed, and so it pained me to see how often money was becoming the goal of our lives, rather than a tool in service to our ultimate goals...

"One of the reasons I wrote "The New Good Life" is to provide people with simple, easy and inexpensive suggestions on how to raise their quality of life while lowering their cost of living, and at the same time lowering their ecological footprint. The book is filled with hundreds of ideas, many of them counter-intuitive.

"Learning to live with respect for ourselves, respect for others, and respect for the whole earth community is no easy task in a culture that has become as out of balance as ours has. We have literally become out of phase with the deepest needs we have as people and as citizens of our dear planet earth..."

read the complete interview at OpEdNews

Billionaire Koch Brothers Financing Climate Confusion: Vertically Integrated Strategies vs. Scientific Concensus

(This is an excerpt from an article in the current New Yorker Magazine. The full article, entitled "Covert Operations- The Billionaire Brothers Who Are Waging War on Obama" can be seen online here)

"Charles Koch seems to have approached both business and politics with the deliberation of an engineer. "To bring about social change," he told Doherty, requires "a strategy" that is "vertically and horizontally integrated," spanning "from idea creation to policy development to education to grassroots organizations to lobbying to litigation to political action." The project, he admitted, was extremely ambitious. "We have a radical philosophy," he said.

"In 1977, the Kochs provided the funds to launch the nation’s first libertarian think tank, the Cato Institute. According to the Center for Public Integrity, between 1986 and 1993 the Koch family gave eleven million dollars to the institute. Today, Cato has more than a hundred full-time employees, and its experts and policy papers are widely quoted and respected by the mainstream media. It describes itself as nonpartisan, and its scholars have at times been critical of both parties. But it has consistently pushed for corporate tax cuts, reductions in social services, and laissez-faire environmental policies.

"When President Obama, in a 2008 speech, described the science on global warming as "beyond dispute," the Cato Institute took out a full-page ad in the Times to contradict him. Cato’s resident scholars have relentlessly criticized political attempts to stop global warming as expensive, ineffective, and unnecessary. Ed Crane, the Cato Institute’s founder and president, told me that "global-warming theories give the government more control of the economy."

"Cato scholars have been particularly energetic in promoting the Climategate scandal. Last year, private e-mails of climate scientists at the University of East Anglia, in England, were mysteriously leaked, and their exchanges appeared to suggest a willingness to falsify data in order to buttress the idea that global warming is real. In the two weeks after the e-mails went public, one Cato scholar gave more than twenty media interviews trumpeting the alleged scandal. But five independent inquiries have since exonerated the researchers, and nothing was found in their e-mails or data to discredit the scientific consensus on global warming.

"Nevertheless, the controversy succeeded in spreading skepticism about climate change. Even though the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration recently issued a report concluding that the evidence for global warming is unequivocal, more Americans are convinced than at any time since 1997 that scientists have exaggerated the seriousness of global warming. The Kochs promote this statistic on their company’s Web site but do not mention the role that their funding has played in fostering such doubt.

"In a 2002 memo, the Republican political consultant Frank Luntz wrote that so long as "voters believe there is no consensus about global warming within the scientific community" the status quo would prevail. The key for opponents of environmental reform, he said, was to question the science- a public-relations strategy that the tobacco industry used effectively for years to forestall regulation. The Kochs have funded many sources of environmental skepticism, such as the Heritage Foundation, which has argued that "scientific facts gathered in the past 10 years do not support the notion of catastrophic human-made warming." The brothers have given money to more obscure groups, too, such as the Independent Women’s Forum, which opposes the presentation of global warming as a scientific fact in American public schools. Until 2008, the group was run by Nancy Pfotenhauer, a former lobbyist for Koch Industries. Mary Beth Jarvis, a vice-president of a Koch subsidiary, is on the group’s board.

"Naomi Oreskes, a professor of history and science studies at the University of California, San Diego, is the co-author of "Merchants of Doubt," a new book that chronicles various attempts by American industry to manipulate public opinion on science. She noted that the Kochs, as the heads of "a company with refineries and pipelines," have "a lot at stake." She added, "If the answer is to phase out fossil fuels, a different group of people are going to be making money, so we shouldn’t be surprised that they’re fighting tooth and nail."

"David Koch told New York that he was unconvinced that global warming has been caused by human activity. Even if it has been, he said, the heating of the planet will be beneficial, resulting in longer growing seasons in the Northern Hemisphere. "The Earth will be able to support enormously more people because far greater land area will be available to produce food," he said.

Read the full article at NewYorker.com